The social platform that processes nearly a billion monthly active users just reported its strongest EBITDA in years, turned cash flow positive, and grew its subscription business 87%, and is still trading near its 52-week low.
Read on, and you get the breakdown of whether that combination of improving fundamentals and depressed valuation makes this worth owning, or whether the 3% ad revenue growth and CEO share sales are the signals that matter more.
Standout Picks Now (Sponsored)
Every market cycle produces a handful of companies that dramatically outperform the rest.
Our latest screening has identified the 5 Stocks Set to Double — companies showing rare early-stage momentum traits.
These picks carry the same indicators that historically precede strong rallies.
Past reports highlighted stocks that surged +175%, +498%, and +673%.
Get the Free 5 Stocks Set to Double Report.
*This free resource is being sent by Zacks. We identify investment resources you may choose to use in making your own decisions. Use of this resource is subject to the Zacks Terms of Service.
*Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investing involves risk. This material does not constitute investment, legal, accounting, or tax advice. Zacks Investment Research is not a licensed dealer, broker, or investment adviser.
Q1 2026: EBITDA Up 115%, Free Cash Flow $205M, Stock Down Anyway
Snap, Inc. (NYSE: SNAP) reported Q1 2026 on May 6. Revenue $1.53 billion, up 12%, at the high end of guidance. Adjusted EBITDA $233 million, up 115% from $108 million a year ago, beating the $215 million consensus.
Free cash flow $205 million. Trailing twelve-month free cash flow is $662 million. None of that reads like structural decline.
The stock fell 7-8% after hours anyway because ad revenue grew only 3%, Q2 guidance was cautious, and the termination of an AI partnership added noise.
At $5.57, about 46% below the $10.41 52-week high, the market is pricing the ad problem and ignoring the EBITDA story.
Adjusted EBITDA $233M, up 115%: From $108M a year ago. More than doubled.
Revenue $1.53B, up 12%, beat guidance: High end of the range, not a miss.
Free cash flow $205M in Q1, $662M trailing twelve months: The cash generation is real.
Ad revenue up only 3%: The problem. Subscriptions and Other revenue up 87%, partially offsetting it.
Daily active users were 483 million, up 5%. Monthly active users hit 956 million. This is not a platform losing users. It is a platform that cannot convert them into ad revenue fast enough.
Action: Buy a half position at $5.50 - $5.75. Q1 profitability is real, but Q2 guidance was cautious. Exit if Q2 EBITDA drops below $180M.
Stay Early (Sponsored)
Find Elon Musk's next big launch and grab yourself an early stake, before the mainstream catches on and it becomes impossible to make huge gains.
Tesla soared 20,000% over 15 years.
xAI grew 250X in two years.
SpaceX has made early backers 2,000X their money since 2010.
Today, we're revealing Elon's NEXT big launch.
This ad is sent on behalf of InvestorPlace Media at 1125 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21201. If you're not interested in this opportunity, please click here.
Subscriptions and Other Revenue Grew 87%, and That Is the Business Model Changing
The AI draft described Snapchat+ as "one of the fastest-growing software lines in social media." That framing is vague. The actual number is better: Other revenue, which is primarily Snapchat+ subscriptions, grew 87% year over year in Q1 2026.
This is a revenue line that did not exist three years ago. It is now a meaningful and rapidly growing portion of total revenue, and it is structurally different from advertising because it does not disappear when the ad market softens.
Snapchat+ provides exclusive features and early access tools.
Management has layered in Lens+ and Snapchat Platinum as additional tiers, expanding the revenue per user ceiling and reducing dependence on the programmatic ad market that has been volatile since 2021.
Other revenue up 87% year over year in Q1: The subscription business is scaling fast.
Snapchat+ subscribers growing consistently: Growth visible in the 87% Other revenue line, even without a disclosed subscriber count.
Subscription revenue does not disappear in a soft ad market: Structural diversification from the ad cycle.
87% subscription growth against 3% ad growth is the story of a revenue model pivoting in real time. The market gives no credit because subscription revenue is still small in absolute dollars. The direction is not small.
Action: Watch the other revenue growth rate each quarter. Above 50% means the subscription pivot is holding. Below 30% means early adopter saturation, and you reassess.
Innovation Focus (Sponsored)
Time magazine recently named this lab "the most disruptive company in the world."
It's not SpaceX or OpenAI.
In fact, its annualized revenues have already surpassed both of these firms.
And this 60-year Wall Street legend believes it's gearing up for a watershed product launch that could send its sales soaring even higher starting June 16.
Click here to learn how you can access a "pre-IPO backdoor" into this firm for just $40 a share.
This ad is sent on behalf of Chaikin Analytics, 201 King Of Prussia Rd., Suite 650, Radnor, PA 19087. If you would like to optout from receiving offers from Chaikin Analytics please click here.
The AR Platform Is Real IP Even If It Is Not Yet a Revenue Line
The AI draft got the AR angle right in concept, but wrong in framing. Snap has been building AR infrastructure since 2016. The Spectacles hardware platform and the Lens Studio developer ecosystem represent genuine technological assets.
The Lens platform processes billions of AR interactions monthly from a developer community that has built over 3 million lenses.
That is a distribution network for AR experiences that no competitor has replicated at scale outside of Meta.
Sponsored AR Lenses and AR Try-On are live products with enterprise brand clients. The monetization is still small as a percentage of total ad revenue, but the infrastructure is built, and the use case is validated.
3 million lenses built by developers on Lens Studio: A developer ecosystem that competitors cannot replicate quickly.
AR Try-On and Sponsored AR Lenses are live commercial products: Not experiments, deployed at scale.
Snap's AR IP is a strategic asset for any hyperscaler entering smart glasses: Potential licensing or acquisition value.
You are not buying Snap for AR revenue today. You are buying the possibility that the infrastructure becomes valuable when the category matures.
At $5.57, the optionality is essentially free on top of a free-cash-flow-positive business.
Action: Any named enterprise brand deal for AR Try-On or Sponsored Lenses is a buy signal not currently priced in. Watch for those announcements.
The Insider Selling Problem Is Real, and You Should Not Ignore It
Evan Spiegel has made five share sales in the past six months, totaling approximately 4.7 million shares for about $35 million. Zero purchases.
Selling at $7-$8 with the stock now at $5.57 is information you need to hold in your investment picture.
Founders sell for estate planning and diversification.
Spiegel has sold throughout Snap's public life. But consistent selling with zero purchases at prices above where the stock now trades is the kind of detail that belongs in the investment picture rather than getting explained away.
Spiegel sold approximately 4.7M shares in six months: Five transactions totaling about $35 million.
Zero insider purchases in the same period: Nobody is buying at current levels from the inside.
Spiegel sold at prices above where the stock trades now: Not a bullish insider signal.
This does not make Snap uninvestable. It makes it a smaller position. Hold both the EBITDA improvement and the insider selling in the same hand.
Action: Check Form 4 filings quarterly. If Spiegel makes even one open-market purchase at current levels, that changes the signal meaningfully. Add on any insider buy.
How Snap Stacks Up Against Meta, Pinterest, and Reddit
The AI draft's peer comparison framing was directionally reasonable but needs updating with correct numbers. Meta trades at approximately 19-23x forward earnings on a business generating nearly $2 billion in quarterly profit.
Pinterest trades at approximately 11-13x forward earnings with similar ad market exposure but a smaller user base. Reddit trades at a premium multiple post-IPO.
Snap has a negative trailing P/E because it is still reporting GAAP losses, so you have to use price-to-sales or EV/EBITDA.
On price-to-sales, Snap, at approximately 1.7x trailing revenue, is among the cheapest in social media. Pinterest is at roughly 3x revenue. Meta at a significant premium.
The 1.7x multiple exists because of ad revenue concentration and competitive pressure, not because the business is disappearing.
Meta at 19-23x forward earnings: Fully valued on dominant ad market position.
Pinterest at 11-13x forward earnings, 3x revenue: More expensive than Snap on a revenue basis.
Snap at approximately 1.7x trailing revenue: Cheapest major social platform on this metric.
The bear argument has been made since 2018. Snap has grown from 200 million to 956 million monthly active users since then. At some point, the survival argument stops being the thesis.
Action: Compare Snap's price-to-sales against Pinterest each quarter. Snap trading at a 40%-plus discount to Pinterest with faster subscription growth is unjustifiably wide.
That gap closing is your hold or add signal.
Trivia: One of Warren Buffett's most influential partners was famous for a single piece of problem-solving advice — borrowed from a 19th century mathematician — that reshaped how value investors think. Who gave us the phrase "invert, always invert"?
The Risks Are Specific, and Ad Revenue Is the One That Matters Most
Three percent ad revenue growth, while Meta grew 16%, is the number that explains where the stock is. Snap's users are less valuable to direct response advertisers than older demographics on Facebook.
The iOS privacy changes in 2021 hit Snap disproportionately, and the recovery has been slower than the broader market.
The soft Q2 guidance and terminated AI partnership are both worth noting. Management's decision not to provide explicit Q2 revenue guidance suggests uncertainty about the ad environment heading into a typically stronger second half.
The terminated AI deal removes one potential near-term revenue diversification vector.
And Q2 consensus is now calling for EPS of -$0.11, which would be worse than Q1's -$0.05, suggesting the profitability improvement is expected to partially reverse in the near term.
Ad revenue up 3% while Meta grew 16%: Share loss in the ad market, not just macro softness.
Q2 guidance cautious with no explicit revenue number: Uncertainty about the next quarter heading in.
Q2 consensus EPS -$0.11, worse than Q1's -$0.05: Profitability expected to pull back seasonally.
None of these risks is new. The question is whether the subscription pivot and EBITDA improvement represent a real structural change or just cost discipline on top of a still-challenged ad business.
Action: Hard stop at $4. Q2 EBITDA below $150M plus flat or negative ad revenue means the business is deteriorating. Exit at $4.
Final Word: Real Profitability in a Platform the Market Has Given Up On
$233M EBITDA, $205M free cash flow, 87% subscription growth, 956 million monthly users, AR optionality on top. The ad business is the honest problem. Insider selling is the caution flag.
Half-position. Hard stop at $4. Add after Q2 confirms Q1 was not a one-quarter event.
Setup Scorecard
Entry Window: $5.50-$5.75. Half-position only given insider selling and ad revenue uncertainty.
Catalyst Watch: Q2 2026 earnings, August 4, ad revenue growth rate, Other revenue growth sustainability, any AR commercial deal announcement, insider trading activity.
Upside Setup: Ad revenue re-accelerates above 10%, subscription revenue sustains above 50% growth, EBITDA stays above $200M in Q2. Stock rerates from 1.7x sales toward 2.5x-3x as the pivot gets recognized. Target $8-$9 over 9-12 months.
Downside Cushion: $662M trailing free cash flow, 956 million monthly users, 87% subscription growth, AR platform optionality, price-to-sales near all-time lows.
What Moves It Next: Q2 ad revenue vs Q1's 3% growth, Q2 EBITDA vs $233M Q1 baseline, subscription revenue growth rate, any enterprise AR partnership announcement.
That's our coverage for today; thanks for reading! Reply to this email with feedback or any value names you want me to check out.
Best Regards,
—Noah Zelvis
Undervalued Edge
