This industry just posted one of its weakest quarters in years, with adjusted operating margin turning negative and net income near zero, and management is calling it the bottom of the cycle.
Stay with this, and you get the full picture of whether the dealer inventory destocking and the buyback at depressed prices represent a trough opportunity, or whether the split analyst opinions and rising leverage mean caution is the better call.
Global Focus (Sponsored)
When DeepSeek hit the headlines, Nvidia dropped nearly $600 billion in a single session.
Every investor felt it: What if China just won the AI race?
But behind closed doors, America has already fired back — with a hidden project at the same Tennessee lab that built the atom bomb.
40,000 scientists.
A device trillions of times more powerful than anything China has built.
A $100 trillion AI reset on the way.
Billion-dollar money manager Louis Navellier has identified the one stock that wins this arms race.
Click here for the name and ticker — free.
*This ad is sent on behalf of InvestorPlace Media at 1125 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21201. If you're not interested in this opportunity, please click here.
Q1 Was Genuinely Bad, and You Should Know That Before Anything Else
CNH Industrial N.V. (NYSE: CNH) reported Q1 2026 on April 30. Revenue $3.83 billion, roughly flat. Net income dropped to $7 million. Basic EPS fell to approximately $0.01. Agriculture’s adjusted EBIT margin collapsed to 1% from 5.4% a year ago.
Consolidated adjusted EBIT margin was negative 4.9%. Management called it the trough. The numbers agree, at least with the trough part.
The stock trades around $10.50-$11, not the $12.60 figure floating around in older quotes. CNH repurchased $26 million of its own stock in Q1 at an average of $10.70, which tells you where management thinks the floor is.
Full-year guidance was reaffirmed, not raised: net sales flat to down 4%, EBIT margin 2.5% to 3.5%, adjusted EPS $0.35 to $0.45. That is a single-digit-cents EPS year, not a hidden growth story.
Q1 net income $7 million, basic EPS approximately $0.01: A near-zero earnings quarter, not a soft beat.
Agriculture adjusted EBIT margin 1%, down from 5.4% a year ago: The core segment cratered.
Consolidated adjusted EBIT margin negative 4.9%: The whole company lost money on an adjusted operating basis.
Stock around $10.50-$11, not $12.60: Get the current price right before you size a position.
Trough calls are exactly what a management team says at the bottom of a cycle. They are also exactly what a management team says while the cycle keeps grinding lower. You do not know which one this is yet.
Action: Make it small and speculative, not a core holding. Buy $10.50-$11 only if you can stomach the stock going lower first. Exit if Q2 margin stays negative and guidance gets cut rather than reaffirmed.
Easy Trading (Sponsored)
Early adopters could have already multiplied their money year after year with this AI, based on the average winning trades it identifies – WITHOUT reading headlines, WITHOUT tracking interest rates, and WITHOUT the constant pressure most traders face.
Right now, you can test this AI yourself, completely free – no email, no credit card required.
Click here to learn more.
Dealer Destocking Is Real, and It Is the Honest Reason for the Bad Numbers
CNH has deliberately undershipped production relative to retail demand to clear dealer lots, with a specific target of $500 million in inventory reduction by year-end.
Building fewer machines than dealers sell at retail means factories absorb fixed costs across a lower volume, which is exactly what produced the negative 4.9% margin.
This is a trackable strategy, not an excuse. The $500 million target by year-end is specific enough to hold management accountable on the next several calls.
When destocking finishes, production realigns, and the operating leverage works in reverse.
Ag dealer inventory flat since start of 2026, $500M reduction targeted by year-end: A specific, trackable number.
Production deliberately running below retail demand: The strategy is crushing current margins on purpose.
Reversal of this dynamic is the entire bull case: Same costs, more units, once destocking ends.
The risk is timing, not direction. Destocking programs in heavy equipment historically take longer than initial guidance suggests. A slip into 2027 means more negative margin quarters.
Action: Track inventory reduction against the $500M target each quarter. Ahead of pace by Q3 means add. Pushed to 2027 means the trough call was premature.
Market Signal (Sponsored)
No one believed Whitney Tilson when he predicted the collapse of Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers.
Or when he went on 60 Minutes exposing a company poisoning its own customers.
The stock fell nearly 80%.
Now he has a new warning about what's REALLY around the corner for America's most beloved tech companies.
Watch for free here.
Tariffs Are a Real and Worsening Headwind on the Construction Side
Agriculture tariff impact is estimated at 210-220 basis points, or roughly $120 million for the year, unchanged.
The construction tariff impact is worse: approximately 600 basis points, up from 500 previously guided. A meaningfully larger hit than management expected one quarter ago.
Steel, components, and cross-border supply chains are baked into how these machines get built. The construction tariff estimate moving against the company, rather than staying flat, is the kind of bad news the trough narrative needs to stop accumulating.
Agriculture tariff impact ~$120M for the year, 210-220bps: Unchanged, at least not getting worse.
Construction tariff impact ~600bps, up from 500bps prior guidance: Getting worse, not better.
Two headwinds are compounding simultaneously: Cyclical demand weakness plus tariff cost inflation at the same time.
You are not buying a story where the only problem is cyclical softness. Cyclical softness and tariff cost inflation are both live, and one just got worse.
Action: Watch the Q2 construction tariff update specifically. Flat or improved from 600bps means the worst is over. Higher again means reduce regardless of other good news.
Brazil Delinquencies Are Rising, and That Is a Credit Risk, Not Just a Cyclical One
Financial Services net income was $74 million in Q1, down year over year on higher Brazil risk costs. Sequential delinquency rates rose to 3.5% on a $28 billion managed portfolio.
That is not a footnote. It is a real credit signal worth tracking separately from the equipment cycle.
Financial Services has historically been a steadier earnings contributor than the cyclical manufacturing segments.
If Brazil worsens, that steadiness erodes exactly when ag and construction are already struggling. Both halves stumbling at once is a real, live risk.
Financial Services net income $74M, down year over year: The steady segment is getting less steady.
Brazil delinquencies up sequentially to 3.5%: A credit trend worth tracking independently of equipment demand.
$28 billion managed portfolio: Scale that makes even modest delinquency moves meaningful in dollar terms.
Net debt to EBITDA has climbed to approximately 2.6x. Not alarming alone, but combined with negative margins and rising credit losses, it removes some margin for error.
Action: Watch the Brazil delinquency rate each quarter. Past 4% means a second active problem layered on the cyclical one, and that is where the bear case gets stronger.
The Analyst Community Is Genuinely Split, and You Should Know Both Sides
This is not a stock where Wall Street has converged. One analyst maintains a sell rating with a $6 target, citing unjustified valuation given demand weakness and rising leverage.
Another maintains buy with a mid-teens target, recently trimmed. A $6 bear case against a mid-teens bull case is a genuinely contested name, not a clean value trap.
The bull case rests on 2026 being the trough, cost actions landing as planned, and destocking finishing on schedule.
The bear case rests on demand weakness extending, tariffs compounding, and Brazil credit losses spreading. Both sides use the same Q1 data and reach opposite conclusions. The uncertainty is real.
Bear case: sell rating, $6 target: Cites unjustified valuation given current fundamentals.
Bull case: buy rating, mid-teens target, recently trimmed: Cites trough-year framing and cost program.
Both sides are reading the same Q1 print: This is genuine disagreement, not an information gap.
When a stock has a credible bear case with a price target roughly 40% below the current price, you size your position accordingly.
This is not the setup for a large allocation. It is the setup for a small, speculative position you are willing to be wrong on.
Action: Size the position as if the $6 bear case has a real chance of being right, not a tail risk you dismiss.
That discipline makes this survivable if the cycle takes longer than management signals.
Poll: What's your philosophy on selling a winner?
How CNH Compares to Deere and Agco Right Now
Deere trades at a higher multiple with similar end-market exposure, but Deere recently traded near its highs on recovery enthusiasm, meaning much of the good news is already in the price.
Agco trades between CNH and Deere with similar cyclical exposure. CNH’s elevated headline multiple is a function of severely depressed earnings, not a premium valuation.
The argument for CNH over Deere is operating leverage.
If the cycle troughs in 2026 and production realigns through 2027, CNH has more margin expansion available because its margins fell further. That is real, and it requires the cycle to cooperate on a timeline nobody can predict.
Deere already priced for recovery: The easy money in the sector leader is behind it.
Agco carries similar cyclical exposure, less Brazil overhang: A cleaner but less leveraged alternative.
CNH’s operating leverage on recovery is real but unconfirmed: Depends on execution not yet been delivered.
You are not choosing CNH because it is the better business. You are choosing it because, if the trough call is right, the leverage on the way up is larger than Deere or Agco. The condition has not been met yet.
Action: Compare CNH’s margin trajectory against Deere’s every quarter. Faster recovery than Deere confirms the operating leverage thesis.
Continued lagging means the conditional bull case is not playing out.
Final Word: A Genuine Trough Call With Real Risk on Both Sides
Negative margin, near-zero net income, guidance reaffirmed, buyback continuing at depressed prices. Destocking is real. Tariffs are real and worsening.
Brazil's credit risk is real. The analyst community is split between a $6 bear case and a mid-teens bull case, with the same data.
Small, speculative position only. Buy $10.50-$11 sized to survive the bear case being right. Hard stop if Q2 margins stay negative and the destocking target gets pushed.
Setup Scorecard
Entry Window: $10.50-$11. Half position or smaller given the split analyst opinion and live risks.
Catalyst Watch: Q2 earnings late July, dealer inventory reduction progress vs the $500M year-end target, construction tariff guidance update, Brazil delinquency trend.
Upside Setup: Destocking completes on or ahead of schedule, tariff headwinds stabilize or improve, Brazil delinquencies plateau below 4%. Margin recovery confirms the trough call and the stock rerates toward mid-teens analyst targets.
Downside Cushion: Active buyback at current prices, reaffirmed (not cut) full-year guidance, $2.1B precision ag platform from the Raven acquisition providing longer-term differentiation.
What Moves It Next: Q2 adjusted EBIT margin direction, dealer inventory progress, construction tariff impact update, and Brazil delinquency rate trend in the Financial Services segment.
That's our coverage for today; thanks for reading! Reply to this email with feedback or any value names you want me to check out.
Best Regards,
—Noah Zelvis
Undervalued Edge
